<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Publications Archieven - Legaltree Advocaten en Notarissen</title>
	<atom:link href="https://legaltree.nl/en/lawyers/type-of-publication/publications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://legaltree.nl/advocaten/type-publicatie/publicaties/</link>
	<description>Quality is personal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 09:57:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Immunity from execution &#8211; A quest for the rule of (customary international) law&#8217;</title>
		<link>https://legaltree.nl/en/state-immunity-in-civil-proceedings-comparative-notes-and-critical-analysis/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max van Leyenhorst]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2025 13:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dispute resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://legaltree.nl/state-immunity-in-civil-proceedings-comparative-notes-and-critical-analysis-2/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In this preliminary opinion Max discusses state immunity from enforcement and the extent to which Dutch case law on this matter is consistent with applicable international law.</p>
<p>Het bericht <a href="https://legaltree.nl/en/state-immunity-in-civil-proceedings-comparative-notes-and-critical-analysis/">Immunity from execution &#8211; A quest for the rule of (customary international) law&#8217;</a> verscheen eerst op <a href="https://legaltree.nl/en/">Legaltree Advocaten en Notarissen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright: the moral rights of Roald Dahl</title>
		<link>https://legaltree.nl/en/copyright-the-moral-rights-of-roald-dahl/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marjolein Driessen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2023 11:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property law (IP) and Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#Adaptedbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#Adjustments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#Author]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#Moralrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#Publisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#RoaldDahl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#TheWitches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://legaltree.nl/?p=15131</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>To what extent is modifying Roald Dahl&#8217;s books allowed Roald Dahl died almost 35 years ago. But his books are as popular as ever, both with children and their (reading) parents. More than 300 million copies have been sold worldwide. Early this year (2023), discussion erupted following the announcement by the British publisher of the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>Het bericht <a href="https://legaltree.nl/en/copyright-the-moral-rights-of-roald-dahl/">Copyright: the moral rights of Roald Dahl</a> verscheen eerst op <a href="https://legaltree.nl/en/">Legaltree Advocaten en Notarissen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re-loaning and the Waadi Act: judges deliver different rulings</title>
		<link>https://legaltree.nl/en/re-loaning-and-the-waadi-act-judges-deliver-different-rulings/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joyce Snijder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2023 12:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://legaltree.nl/re-loaning-and-the-waadi-act-judges-deliver-different-rulings/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Temporary workers are entitled to the same pay as permanent employees under the Waadi Act. What about in the case of on-lending? That is complicated, explains Joyce Snijder.</p>
<p>Het bericht <a href="https://legaltree.nl/en/re-loaning-and-the-waadi-act-judges-deliver-different-rulings/">Re-loaning and the Waadi Act: judges deliver different rulings</a> verscheen eerst op <a href="https://legaltree.nl/en/">Legaltree Advocaten en Notarissen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can a freelancer invoke the prohibition on obstruction in the WAADI?</title>
		<link>https://legaltree.nl/en/can-a-freelancer-invoke-the-prohibition-on-obstruction-in-the-waadi/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joyce Snijder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2023 12:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://legaltree.nl/can-a-freelancer-invoke-the-prohibition-on-obstruction-in-the-waadi/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A &#8220;zzp&#8217;er&#8221; (freelancer) can also invoke the prohibition of obstruction in the Waadi, court rules. Joyce Snijder of Legaltree explains what this means. Read the article here (Dutch)</p>
<p>Het bericht <a href="https://legaltree.nl/en/can-a-freelancer-invoke-the-prohibition-on-obstruction-in-the-waadi/">Can a freelancer invoke the prohibition on obstruction in the WAADI?</a> verscheen eerst op <a href="https://legaltree.nl/en/">Legaltree Advocaten en Notarissen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The implications of judgment X vs City of Amsterdam for the hiring of freelancers</title>
		<link>https://legaltree.nl/en/the-implications-of-judgment-x-vs-city-of-amsterdam-for-the-hiring-of-freelancers/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joyce Snijder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2023 12:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://legaltree.nl/the-implications-of-judgment-x-vs-city-of-amsterdam-for-the-hiring-of-freelancers/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court ruled in November 2020 in the case of X v municipality of Amsterdam. The legal difference between employment and self-employment has long been unclear. Joyce Snijder explains the implications of the Supreme Court ruling for clients and intermediaries. (Dutch article) Read the article here (Dutch)</p>
<p>Het bericht <a href="https://legaltree.nl/en/the-implications-of-judgment-x-vs-city-of-amsterdam-for-the-hiring-of-freelancers/">The implications of judgment X vs City of Amsterdam for the hiring of freelancers</a> verscheen eerst op <a href="https://legaltree.nl/en/">Legaltree Advocaten en Notarissen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A look back at jurisdiction 2020 for the flex industry</title>
		<link>https://legaltree.nl/en/a-look-back-atspraak-2020-for-the-flex-industry/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joyce Snijder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2023 12:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://legaltree.nl/a-look-back-atspraak-2020-for-the-flex-industry/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Joyce Snijder of Legaltree gives an overview of the key statements in 2020 for the flex industry. Read the article here (Dutch)</p>
<p>Het bericht <a href="https://legaltree.nl/en/a-look-back-atspraak-2020-for-the-flex-industry/">A look back at jurisdiction 2020 for the flex industry</a> verscheen eerst op <a href="https://legaltree.nl/en/">Legaltree Advocaten en Notarissen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dutch Supreme Court Finds for the First Time on Corruption and Arbitration in Context of Annulment Proceedings: Case Report on the Bariven and Yukos Decisions</title>
		<link>https://legaltree.nl/en/dutch-supreme-court-finds-for-the-first-time-on-corruption-and-arbitration-in-context-of-annulment-proceedings-case-report-on-the-bariven-and-yukos-decisions/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wouter de Clerck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2023 12:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Dispute resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud, investigations and recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://legaltree.nl/dutch-supreme-court-finds-for-the-first-time-on-corruption-and-arbitration-in-context-of-annulment-proceedings-case-report-on-the-bariven-and-yukos-decisions/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Dutch Supreme Court Finds for the First Time on Corruption and Arbitration in Context of Annulment Proceedings: Case Report on the Bariven and Yukos Decisions W.J.L. de Clerck, Journal of International Arbitration 39, no. 6 (2022)</p>
<p>Het bericht <a href="https://legaltree.nl/en/dutch-supreme-court-finds-for-the-first-time-on-corruption-and-arbitration-in-context-of-annulment-proceedings-case-report-on-the-bariven-and-yukos-decisions/">Dutch Supreme Court Finds for the First Time on Corruption and Arbitration in Context of Annulment Proceedings: Case Report on the Bariven and Yukos Decisions</a> verscheen eerst op <a href="https://legaltree.nl/en/">Legaltree Advocaten en Notarissen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disclosure duties and foreign proceedings on the merits in Dutch attachment proceedings – case note on the 15 July 2022 judgment of the District Court Noord-Holland</title>
		<link>https://legaltree.nl/en/disclosure-duties-and-foreign-proceedings-on-the-merits-in-dutch-attachment-proceedings-case-note-on-the-15-july-2022-judgment-of-the-district-court-noord-holland/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wouter de Clerck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2023 12:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://legaltree.nl/disclosure-duties-and-foreign-proceedings-on-the-merits-in-dutch-attachment-proceedings-case-note-on-the-15-july-2022-judgment-of-the-district-court-noord-holland/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Disclosure duties and foreign proceedings on the merits in Dutch attachment proceedings – case note on the 15 July 2022 judgment of the District Court Noord-Holland W.J.L. de Clerck, BER 2022-8</p>
<p>Het bericht <a href="https://legaltree.nl/en/disclosure-duties-and-foreign-proceedings-on-the-merits-in-dutch-attachment-proceedings-case-note-on-the-15-july-2022-judgment-of-the-district-court-noord-holland/">Disclosure duties and foreign proceedings on the merits in Dutch attachment proceedings – case note on the 15 July 2022 judgment of the District Court Noord-Holland</a> verscheen eerst op <a href="https://legaltree.nl/en/">Legaltree Advocaten en Notarissen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Response to &#8216;Peeking through the fence of the Peace Palace: are Hague judges allowed?&#8217;</title>
		<link>https://legaltree.nl/en/reply-to-gluren-door-het-hek-van-het-vredespaleis-mogen-haagse-rechters-dat-wel/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wouter de Clerck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2022 14:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dispute resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://legaltree.nl/?p=13695</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Response to article Teun Struycken,&#8217;Peeking through the fence of the Peace Palace: are Hague judges allowed?’ M. van Leyenhorst (hoofdauteur), W. de Clerck, NJB 2022/14, WoltersKluwer</p>
<p>Het bericht <a href="https://legaltree.nl/en/reply-to-gluren-door-het-hek-van-het-vredespaleis-mogen-haagse-rechters-dat-wel/">Response to &#8216;Peeking through the fence of the Peace Palace: are Hague judges allowed?&#8217;</a> verscheen eerst op <a href="https://legaltree.nl/en/">Legaltree Advocaten en Notarissen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>[DUTCH] Noot bij arrest Hof Amsterdam 23-02-2021, ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2021:542, Gemeentestem 2021/7525 (93)</title>
		<link>https://legaltree.nl/en/dutch-noot-bij-arrest-hof-amsterdam-23-02-2021-eclinlghams2021542-gemeentestem-2021-7525-93/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Willemijn Lever]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2021 13:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Construction, Real Estate and Leasing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://legaltree.nl/dutch-noot-bij-arrest-hof-amsterdam-23-02-2021-eclinlghams2021542-gemeentestem-2021-7525-93/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Noot W. Lever MRICS bij arrest Hof Amsterdam 23-02-2021, ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2021:542, Gemeentestem 2021/7525 (93), Wolters Kluwer. De omstandigheid dat een publiekrechtelijke ontheffing niet is ingetrokken, staat niet in de weg aan de beëindiging van de privaatrechtelijke toestemming door middel van opzegging. Geen onaanvaardbare doorkruising van het publiekrecht. (Hoogheemraadschap Rijnland) Lees de noot hier.</p>
<p>Het bericht <a href="https://legaltree.nl/en/dutch-noot-bij-arrest-hof-amsterdam-23-02-2021-eclinlghams2021542-gemeentestem-2021-7525-93/">[DUTCH] Noot bij arrest Hof Amsterdam 23-02-2021, ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2021:542, Gemeentestem 2021/7525 (93)</a> verscheen eerst op <a href="https://legaltree.nl/en/">Legaltree Advocaten en Notarissen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
