– case note on the 9 January 2023 decision of the District Court Amsterdam
About the author
Wouter de Clerck
Wouter de Clerck specialises in complex, cross-border disputes which are settled either by arbitration or before the national courts. Most of his clients are active in the technology, energy or mining sector.More from Wouter de Clerck
Refusal of recognition of and leave to enforce Swedish arbitral award in connection with corruptionWouter de Clerck - December 23, 2023
Read moreDispute resolution, Fraud, investigations and recovery
Interpretation of Dutch bank guarantee with application of English arbitration lawWouter de Clerck - December 23, 2023
Read moreDispute resolution
Dutch Supreme Court Finds for the First Time on Corruption and Arbitration in Context of Annulment Proceedings: Case Report on the Bariven and Yukos DecisionsWouter de Clerck - January 3, 2023
Read moreDispute resolution, Fraud, investigations and recovery
Disclosure duties and foreign proceedings on the merits in Dutch attachment proceedings – case note on the 15 July 2022 judgment of the District Court Noord-HollandWouter de Clerck - January 3, 2023
Read moreResponse to ‘Peeking through the fence of the Peace Palace: are Hague judges allowed?’Wouter de Clerck and Max Van Leyenhorst - May 25, 2022
Read moreDispute resolution
Cross-border pre-judgment attachments: Dutch leave to attach enforceable in other EU member statesSander Oorthuys and Wouter de Clerck - March 23, 2021
Read moreDispute resolution
[Dutch] Uitgestelde werking van de nieuwe arbitragewet: pleidooi voor een eenvoudige(r) lezing van het overgangsrechtWouter de Clerck - November 1, 2020
Read moreDispute resolution
Dutch decision on Hague Service Convention: award creditors must play by the book or suffer delays (but there is potential for procedural time gains)Wouter de Clerck - September 18, 2020
Read moreDispute resolution
[Dutch] Groots perspectief. Opstellen aangeboden aan mr. drs. T.D. de GrootWouter de Clerck - December 14, 2017
Read moreDispute resolution